Home The Author The Book Reviews FAQs More Stuff The Other Side


BLOG

RSS Feed 

Tuesday, August 01, 2006

 

Am I going to get in trouble?

I ask the question because I seem, without meaning any harm, to have entered into the stormy waters of what-makes-something-genre.

I recently read a review (http://www.emcit.com/emcit131.php#Wolves) of my book on a science fiction website which, while gratifyingly positive, shows something I've encountered before in friends who are sci fi fans - a deep exasperation with authors, publishers or critics who produce books that have a fantastical or speculative element and then deny that it's sci fi or fantasy. The frustration is twofold, I think: one, annoyance that something gets sublimated out of their favourite genre out of a kind of critical courtesy because it's well written (with the implication that good writing is out of the question for a genre work); two, annoyance with works by mainstream authors that re-invent the wheel and get considered more original than genre fans think they are. Now, I wrote a book involving werewolves, which is being marketed as a 'literary thriller that transcends the bounds of genre'. A phrase which I've got a dawning suspicion is going to have a red-rag effect on some genre enthusiasts.

Of course, it is annoying if critics deny that anything in your favourite genre could be good. It's silly, as well: every genre has good stuff in it if you know where to look. But from a personal perspective, it's an argument I never really had a position in. I never read by genre, and really I think the whole idea of genre can cause more problems than it solves. (There's a lot of rambling to this effect in my FAQ section, so I won't repeat it here, it's just a click away . . .) I certainly don't want to annoy sci fi fans, who have generally been very nice people based on personal experience, but at the same time, I don't mind being referred to as genre-transcending; my desire is that the book can be read by people both in and outside the various genre communities, and the description hopefully points towards that.

More than that, I just didn't write it with a genre in mind. As the reviewer most perceptively points out, the real focus is on the heroine, which is the case in all kinds of books of different genres. I'm a bit stupid about genre, really: I had no idea what genre the book was while composing it. I wasn't fussed. What mattered to me was the heroine and the story, and to serve that, I was taking a genre salad approach. It has elements from horror, from crime novels, from feminist literature, from history, even from poetry - at least, the Christina Rossetti poem I quoted at the beginning was as big an influence on the style as anything else, including all the sci fi and horror books and movies I went through to make sure I wasn't re-inventing the wheel. It was just the book what I was writing.

As a result, now it's getting published, I find I don't really care what genre it gets called. Correction, for I am sworn to tell the truth: I do care what genre it gets called. I want everyone who reads it to think it belongs in whichever genre is their personal favourite. I want people to like it; what other books they like is up to them, and the more the merrier, say I.

But will this position wash? Am I going to be allowed to get away with it? Or have I idly steered my little ship out of the bay into a howling gale?

I have the feeling I shall shortly be finding out.

Comments:
I think there can be a tendency for genre fans to read any attempt by an author to 'transcend the boundaries' as being motivated by some kind of embarassment about the genre, or even active prejudice against it. In Sci-fi they seem to like their authors loud and proud. I think as long as you remain your usual friendly, open-minded self you'll be absolutely fine.
 
The key, I imagine, is to avoid actually insulting anyone. The largest recent outbreak of genre wrangling was over Oryx And Crake, as summed up by affable uberfan Dave Langford:

http://www.ansible.co.uk/sfx/sfx107.html

Blessedly, Atwood didn't go as far as the "sciffy can't be literature" position that really pushes buttons, but the Squids! In! Space! thing maybe comes off as a little dismissive.

Folk who identify as fantasy/horror fans may roll their eyes if Bareback gets shelved in "Novels", but as long you avoid sweeping dismissals of all they hold dear, I doubt they'll hold it against you.
 
I'm sure this point has already been debated to death elsewhere but I wonder if it's possible for any novel to belong to only one genre. Even the most rigid detective novel will invariably contain some elements of romance or thriller tropes. Ditto Sci-fi, Fantasy, etc.So genres are really more about a book's predominant flavour than it's entire content.
Hmm... That's not very controversial.
OK, how about this: books should be assigned genres based on the author's hair colour and credit rating...
 
All books should be assigned a genre by HAROLD BLOOM. As a freebie, he'll also label each work as either Sublime or The Death Of Art.

All books should also be assigned an SKU category, by the chief buyer for WATERSTONES. Category will be chosen strictly with the intention of maximising sales potential, and if this leaves White Teeth shelved in Cosmetics & Skin Care and Bareback in Erotica, so be it.
 
Post a Comment



<< Home

Archives

July 2006   August 2006   September 2006   October 2006   November 2006   December 2006   January 2007   February 2007   March 2007   April 2007   May 2007   June 2007   July 2007   August 2007   September 2007   October 2007   November 2007   December 2007   January 2008   February 2008   March 2008   April 2008   May 2008   June 2008   July 2008   August 2008   September 2008   October 2008   November 2008   December 2008   January 2009   February 2009   March 2009   April 2009   May 2009   June 2009   July 2009   August 2009   September 2009   October 2009   November 2009   December 2009   January 2010   February 2010   March 2010   April 2010   June 2010   July 2010   August 2010   September 2010   October 2010   November 2010   December 2010   January 2011   February 2011   March 2011   April 2011   May 2011   June 2011   July 2011   August 2011   September 2011   October 2011   November 2011   December 2011   January 2012   February 2012   March 2012   April 2012   May 2012   June 2012   July 2012   August 2012   September 2012   October 2012   November 2012   December 2012   January 2013   February 2013   March 2013   April 2013   May 2013   June 2013   July 2013   August 2013   September 2013   October 2013   March 2014  

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?